Take all its place

Jean-Yves Mercier

Taking our place means deciding to take responsibility. It means having the courage to take on a role in confronting our aspirations with our changing professional realities. Self-leadership goes further. It's taking your place, but also taking your place.

 
The personal development movement has a tendency to instill in us that each of us has our “true self.” It is up to us to identify it and to live it in the same way at all times in our lives. It's simplistic. We can be different at work and at home. And in our professional environment, it is rare that we have exactly the same attitudes towards our superiors, our customers, our colleagues or our collaborators. There is nothing wrong with that, quite the opposite. Each of our interactions shapes who we are. We learn from different situations and develop different expressions of ourselves. The problem is not role-playing, but wearing a mask. What happens if one of these roles doesn't work for us. In this case, we lose ourselves in an identity that is not ours, conforming to external ideals and expectations. Taking our full place means remaining the main actor in our roles.

 

Could it be by focusing on activities that challenge us while mobilizing our skills, the famous state of “flow”? Or by leaving our comfort zone to develop new ones? These metaphors are misleading if we think of them as an injunction to make the most of our existing or potential skills. We are not just productive machines. We have desires. It means doing something that is important to us. Taking your full place implies pursuing a success that corresponds to our aspirations, whether in terms of contributing to society or social success for example. These determinants are very personal and require awareness. Beyond aspiration, they also refer to the concept of ambition.

 

Being ambitious is necessary to take your full place. Of course, ambition can have a negative connotation associated with selfishness and the pursuit of power. For a leader, for example, the ambition must be focused on the collective. A true leader does not lock himself in his ego, he is open to his aspirations as well as to his environment in order to put forward a vision that can be followed. For everyone, it is the same. Taking our full place means sharing through our actions not only our skills or our personality, but also what we want to contribute to.
 
Ultimately, self-leadership is a personal quest that involves constantly balancing our individual aspirations, collective ambitions, values, and resources by taking responsibility for our environment. It is the answer that each of us can give to our need to build the meaning of our action.

Return to the blog

Discover other items

Is it time to change professionally?

When considering a career change, can we make sure we're on the right track? And more importantly, can we make sure it's the right time?

Individual sense and collective sense, a co-responsibility

Fixed visions, where the individual entrusts the company with giving it meaning, where the company instructs its employees to adhere to the collective sense, are no longer enough. There is full co-responsibility for the relationship between the 2 parties. The individual is fully responsible for their well-being at work, without this taking away from the company's responsibility in this area. The company is totally responsible for the resistance it encounters, without this in any way taking away from the responsibility for the development of its employees. These sentences shake up many ideas that are rooted in our societies. They are simply tackling the good old fashioned search for the culprit.

Do you have to be ambitious to be a good leader?

“The teeth that scratch the parquet.” This famous expression, an image of human ambition, sounds like a judgment. Indeed, the ambitious who seeks success, status and money at all costs. The one who always wants more for purely personal purposes. But is ambition confined only to this pejorative straitjacket? However, if it is perceived so negatively, cannot ambition be at the service of the best? Do you have to have ambition to be a real leader?

International recognition for the Self-Leadership program

Our Self-Leadership program was already largely legitimized by practice, whether by its wide distribution or its attested impact on the professional lives of its beneficiaries. It still lacked official and independent international recognition. It is now done.